REVIEW! The Hudson Review: “In its disjunctiveness and linguistic density, Heard-Hoard may seem to be the most conventionally experimental of the books under review. Yet, in its portrayals of outcasts and vagrants like Candy, its grounding on local speech, its emotional intensity, and its devotion to story, it is, ironically, the most Wordsworthian: radical in its bracing mix of lyric and narrative and in its deeply compassionate humanism.”   

  • REVIEW! Meg Schoerke reviews Heard-Hoard — The Hudson Review:

https://hudsonreview.com/2022/05/lyric-tales/#.YnAtgS1h3fY➠➠

 

“In its disjunctiveness and linguistic density, Heard-Hoard may seem to be the most conventionally experimental of the books under review. Yet, in its portrayals of outcasts and vagrants like Candy, its grounding on local speech, its emotional intensity, and its devotion to story, it is, ironically, the most Wordsworthian: radical in its bracing mix of lyric and narrative and in its deeply compassionate humanism.”   
____________________
“. . . the habitat of Heard-Hoard is disquietingly original. “
___________________
“Riley argues throughout Heard-Hoard that stories define us and that the most primal ones are “radical”: arising from extremity and provoking equally extreme change (soul-splitting, and thus soul-making).”
____________________
. . . the pain and alienation articulated by each character are nonetheless singular, as in the pitch-perfect (and perfectly paced) poem “Moth” . . .Transformed from person into thing, Candy endures a trauma so radical (in the moment, and in memory) that she can only speak of it through metaphor, or not at all.”